Audit
Scholarship & Grant File Review
Targeted scrutiny for award applications where budgets, impact statements, and eligibility forms must align.
From ¥52,000
Scholarship and grant committees read for mismatch as much as for merit. A glowing impact paragraph beside a vague budget line invites quiet rejection. This review stresses those joints: dates, amounts, host institutions, and claims about need or novelty.
The deliverable is a findings memo you can take back to a supervisor or family supporter — plain language, no theatre.
Engagement notes
- For: Students and early-career professionals applying to named scholarships or small research grants.
- Outcome: Alignment notes between narrative, budget logic, and eligibility claims before submission.
- Scope: Narrative plus budget summary and eligibility checklist; findings memo focused on consistency risks.
- Outside scope: Full financial modelling, sponsor negotiation, or institutional grant office liaison.
- Timing: Four to six business days. — Remote from Aomori; optional call for budget narrative questions.
- Prepare: Funder guidelines and your current drafts.
- Fees: Fixed fee by complexity of budget tables.